Title: Dose–effect relationship and estimation of the carcinogenic effects of low doses of ionising radiation: the Joint Report of the Academie des Sciences (Paris) and of the Academie Nationale de Medecine

Authors: Maurice Tubiana, Andre Aurengo

Addresses: Centre Antoine Beclere, Faculte de Medecine, 45 rue des Saints-Peres, 75006 Paris, France. ' Centre Antoine Beclere, Faculte de Medecine, 45 rue des Saints-Peres, 75006 Paris, France

Abstract: The aim of the Joint Report of the two French Academies is to discuss the validity of the linear non threshold (LNT) dose-effect relationship for assessing the detrimental effects of small doses such as those delivered by X-ray examinations (0.1 mGy to 20 mGy). The conclusion of the report is that extrapolation with LNT could greatly overestimate those risks and thus may have a detrimental effect for public health by discouraging physicians and patients from performing potentially useful radiological examinations (for example a mammography or a CT scan) when the risk appears to be too large. This conclusion against the validity of LNT is based on several types of data: 1. Epidemiology has not evidenced cancer excess in humans for doses below 100 mSv. 2. Experimental animal data have not evidenced a carcinogenic effect for doses below 100 mSv. Moreover, dose-effect relationships are very seldom linear; most of them are linear-quadratic or quadratic. A practical threshold or hormetic effects have been observed in a large number of experimental studies. 3. Radiobiology: LNT assumes that the genotoxic risk (per unit dose) is constant irrespective of dose and dose rate and thus that the efficacy of the two guardians of the genome, DNA repair and elimination by death of cells with DNA damage do not vary with dose and dose rate. This assumption is not consistent with a large number of recent radiobiological data, for example mutational effect and lethal effect vary (per unit dose). The second assumption is that a given DNA damage has the same probability of initiating a cancer irrespective of the number of other DNA damage in the same cell and in the neighbouring cells. This assumption is also non consistent with recent data and modern concepts of carcinogenesis in which the microenvironment and tissue disorganisation play an important role. The existence of a threshold dose in individuals or animals contaminated by radium or thorium shows that the irradiation of a cell surrounded by non-irradiated cells does not initiate carcinogenesis. It is the responsibility of the proponents of LNT to demonstrate the validity of these two assumptions in order to justify the use of LNT. The recent reports do not provide such demonstrations.

Keywords: low radiation; ionising radiation; X-rays; apoptosis; DNA repair; low dosage; dose-effect relationship; carcinogenic effects; dose rate; epidemiology; France; experimental data; intracellular signalisation; intercellular signalisation; lethal effects; linear no threshold relationship; mutational effect; oxidative stress; radiocarcinogenesis; radiology; genotoxic risk; cancer.

DOI: 10.1504/IJLR.2006.009510

International Journal of Low Radiation, 2006 Vol.2 No.3/4, pp.135 - 153

Available online: 17 Apr 2006 *

Full-text access for editors Access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article