Authors: Greg McComb
Addresses: University of Manitoba and Environment Canada, 24th Floor, 10 Wellington, Street, Hull, Quebec, K1A OH3, Canada
Abstract: Contingent valuation (CV) is a survey technique used to value environmental goods not traded in markets, such as improvements to air or water quality. Despite its popularity, widespread acceptance of this methodology has been hampered by controversies stemming from numerous behavioural anomalies such as preference reversals, embedding and starting point bias. This study argues that these anomalies are better understood using bounded rationality to model behaviour, rather than traditional economic theories of rationality. To demonstrate this, a conceptual framework is developed which explains the various aspects of bounded rationality. This framework is then applied to a literature review and a CV experiment that values an improvement to municipal water quality in Winnipeg, Canada. The results indicate that the research design mitigated many possible anomalies and that bounded rationality provided a useful conceptual framework to understand anomalous results that did arise.
Keywords: contingent valuation (CV); bounded rationality; water quality; constructive preferences; satisfice; heuristic; preference reversals; embedding; behavioural decision research; protocol; benefit cost analysis; psychology.
International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 2002 Vol.1 No.3, pp.234-248
Available online: 17 Jul 2003 *Full-text access for editors Access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article