Authors: Anil Hira; Brian Wixted; Ricardo Arechavala-Vargas
Addresses: Political Science, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada. ' Centre for Policy Research on Science and Technology, Simon Fraser University, 515 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC V5A 1S6, Canada. ' IDITpyme, Universidad de Guadalajara, Giosue Carducci 5621, Col. Jardines Vallarta, Zapopan, Jalisco, CP 45027, Mexico
Abstract: What explains the uneven competitiveness we find in global markets, where some firms are able to dominate? Obvious path dependency and stickiness in markets persists, despite efforts by others with potentially greater comparative advantage. An evolutionary view of global market competitiveness provides the best answer. Timing determines fortunes. In order to take advantage of technological windows of opportunity, a co-evolutionary state-private sector partnership is required. Our study of the emergence of wireless manufacturing entrants suggests that success depends on the ability to adapt to changes in comparative advantage, markets, and technology. Globalisation therefore requires even more state intervention, albeit in more strategic ways, not less, and state intervention is at the heart of the success of national firms. The cyclical nature of global markets and technology advances offers currently unrecognised opportunities for late entrants.
Keywords: technology innovation; evolutionary cycles; windows of opportunity; wireless technology; wireless communications; globalisation; industrial policy; state-private partnerships; public-private partnerships; PPPs; wireless manufacturing; state intervention; late entrants; market entry.
International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 2012 Vol.6 No.1/2, pp.3 - 26
Published online: 31 Oct 2014 *Full-text access for editors Access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article