Title: Land application of sewage sludges: an appraisal of the US regulations

Authors: Ellen Z. Harrison, Murray B. McBride, David R. Bouldin

Addresses: Cornell University Waste Management Institute, Center for the Environment, Rice Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. Dept. of Soil Crop and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Bradfield Hall, Ithaca, NY, USA 14853. Dept. of Soil Crop and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Bradfield Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA

Abstract: Current US federal regulations governing the land application of sewage sludges do not appear adequately protective of human health, agricultural productivity or ecological health. US standards are far less protective than those of many European countries and Canadian provinces. This is due to both policy choices such as a ||do no harm|| philosophy applied in some northern European countries and also to many gaps and non-conservative assumptions in the risk assessment performed by US Environmental Protection Agency. The potential for widespread use of sludges on agricultural and residential land, the persistence of many of the pollutants, which may remain in soils for a very long time, and the difficulty of remediation support a cautious approach. Soil, water and crop characteristics in New York State and other areas of the northeastern US raise particular concerns. The authors do not suggest a prohibition of land application but, rather, significantly more restrictive use. Limiting cumulative additions of pollutants to prevent soils from exceeding recommended maximum contaminant levels can be achieved by application of clean sludges or by application of lesser amounts of less high quality sludges. Further investigation is needed to assess risks to ground and surface water and to establish standards for additional contaminants.

Keywords: land application; regulations; risk assessment; sewage sludge; soil standards; US EPA.

DOI: 10.1504/IJEP.1999.002247

International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 1999 Vol.11 No.1, pp.1-36

Published online: 13 Dec 2003 *

Full-text access for editors Access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article