You can view the full text of this article for free using the link below.

Title: Research on test scenarios of AEB pedestrian system based on knowledge and accident data

Authors: Yubin Qian; Yuanchao Qiu; Lingyun Xiao; Wenhao Hu; Honglei Dong

Addresses: School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai, China ' School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai, China ' State Administration for Market Regulation Defective Product Administrative Centre, Beijing, China; China National Institute of Standardisation, Yangtze Delta Region Branch, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, China ' School of Transportation Science and Engineering BUAA, Beihang University, Beijing, China ' State Administration for Market Regulation Defective Product Administrative Centre, Beijing, China; State Administration for Market Regulation Key Laboratory (Product Defect and Safety), Beijing, China

Abstract: Since pedestrians are Vulnerable Road Users (VRU), the collision proportion and casualty rate are still high between vehicle and pedestrian, while the current Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) system lacks relative overall pedestrian test scenarios. Based on the National Automobile Accident In-depth Investigation System (NAIS) in-depth accident data about the collision accidents between passenger car and pedestrian in 220 cases, five typical AEB pedestrian system scenarios are obtained by clustering analysis and chi-square test in this paper; then, based on the second typical scenario, three more severe test scenarios are obtained by analysing pedestrian-vehicle collision avoidance model and the actual road traffic situation in China from the perspective of user acceptance; finally, eight times field operation test shows that the test vehicle is subject to premature braking. This paper provides a reference for establishment and further optimisation of AEB pedestrian test scenario in China.

Keywords: AEB pedestrian system; accident in-depth investigation; clustering analysis; typical scenarios; user acceptance; field operation test.

DOI: 10.1504/IJVS.2022.129627

International Journal of Vehicle Safety, 2022 Vol.12 No.3/4, pp.322 - 343

Accepted: 10 Feb 2022
Published online: 17 Mar 2023 *

Full-text access for editors Full-text access for subscribers Free access Comment on this article