Title: The nature of scientific progress in organisational research

Authors: Valentina Tymoshenko

Addresses: University of Kyiv, Nezalezhnosti Ave, 91, Kyiv, Ukraine

Abstract: Organisational theories differ from theories in natural sciences and many theories in social sciences as they are too ambiguous to be tested empirically and there are no competition and natural selection between different theories. In addition, different philosophical assumptions held by organisational researchers from different camps prevent this selection. Given this fragmented nature of organisational sciences and the eclectic nature of organisational theories, which precludes its empirical testing and natural selection, the paper asks and discusses what is meant by progress in social sciences in general and in organisational research in particular. The progress in organisational sciences is equated to theory development as the end in itself while the latest consists from observations and classifications instead of generalisations and increase in explanatory and predictive power. The position that organisational theories should be accessible to empirical tests by clearly delineating their domain of application is defended.

Keywords: scientific progress; organisational theories; philosophy of science; theoretical contribution; institutional theory.

DOI: 10.1504/IJMCP.2021.117979

International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 2021 Vol.14 No.2, pp.154 - 167

Received: 12 Oct 2020
Accepted: 14 Feb 2021

Published online: 05 Oct 2021 *

Full-text access for editors Full-text access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article