Title: National policy and limits to popular dissent: the case of the F-35

Authors: Charles R. Simpson

Addresses: State University of New York at Plattsburgh, 101 Broad Street, Plattsburgh, NY 12901, USA

Abstract: Grassroots movements protecting the environment in the US may gain local political traction when conceptualised as demands for discrete policy modification to remedy local impacts. In such cases, harm is visible and victims motivated. When local demands for reform contradict a national bipartisan consensus however, they are easily blocked irrespective of evidence or local democracy. At that point, activists must directly challenge fundamental tenants of national policy in order to succeed. Opposition to the basing F-35 fighter/bombers in Vermont exemplifies this dynamic. Opponents won municipal victories but were defeated at the federal level. Hesitant to be called unpatriotic, they failed to initially challenge American exceptionalism or the arms industry as foundations for national security and prosperity. Using participant observation, this paper explores the tactical and idelogical constraints faced by local environmental movements whose success requires deep structural change in national ideology and the economy.

Keywords: F-35; American exceptionalism; aircraft noise impacts; nuclear weapons; military-industrial complex.

DOI: 10.1504/IER.2020.106153

Interdisciplinary Environmental Review, 2020 Vol.20 No.2, pp.83 - 99

Received: 05 Sep 2018
Accepted: 17 Jan 2019
Published online: 01 Apr 2020 *

Full-text access for editors Full-text access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article