Regulation of Uber in São Paulo: from conflict to regulatory experimentation
by Rafael A.F. Zanatta; Beatriz Kira
International Journal of Private Law (IJPL), Vol. 9, No. 1/2, 2018

Abstract: This paper presents a case study of the legal tensions and conflicts behind the regulation of Uber, one of the most famous tech firms in the peer-to-peer platform market, in the city of São Paulo, the largest Brazilian city. Covering the period of two years (2014-2016), the paper argues that the legal complexity of the debate became bigger in a short period and involved diverse actors and legal instruments. Based on a socio-legal approach, the paper investigates the mobilisation of resources and legal knowledge in the regulation of this tech firm and how it progressively involved the legislative, judiciary and executive powers. The study organises the regulatory conflict in three periods: 'trouble arises', 'battle of legal opinions' and 'experimental regulation'. Finally, it discusses the viability of comparative research in places with similar cultural and legal characteristics.

Online publication date: Tue, 15-Jan-2019

The full text of this article is only available to individual subscribers or to users at subscribing institutions.

 
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.

Pay per view:
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.

Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Private Law (IJPL):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:

Username:        Password:          Forgotten your password?

Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.

If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com