Enforcing community guidelines in web-based communities: the case of flame comments on YouTube Online publication date: Sat, 25-Jun-2016
by Michael Nycyk
International Journal of Web Based Communities (IJWBC), Vol. 12, No. 2, 2016
Abstract: Web-based communities face increasing pressures from governments and the public to enforce community guidelines that discourage and prevent negative member behaviours. This study explores the behaviour of flaming and the tensions the language of flaming causes in a community. Flames are hostile, profane and intimidating comments that can disrupt participation in a community. Using YouTube as a case study, a grounded theory exploratory study was undertaken to examine the characteristics of flame comments that clash with YouTube's community guidelines, particularly those aimed at preventing hateful speech against groups in society. A theory, represented by the term 'acceptability of language use', emerged from the analysis to describe the tension YouTube faces in enforcing a civil community and preventing hate speech. Although the study raises more questions than it answers, it illuminates the debate regarding what boundaries web community owners and members will tolerate.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Web Based Communities (IJWBC):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook