A comparative analysis of metadata best practices and guidelines: issues and implications Online publication date: Tue, 16-Feb-2016
by Jung-Ran Park; Andrew Brenza; Caimei Lu
International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies (IJMSO), Vol. 10, No. 4, 2015
Abstract: Through a comparative analysis of local institutions' metadata guidelines based on Dublin Core (DC) metadata, the study examines variations and commonalities in terms of metadata usage and naming conventions and the usage of refinement qualifiers and encoding standards. The study also examines the influence of subject domain and resource type in naming conventions. The study results evince divergence across metadata guidelines especially designed for resource and domain specific repositories. The naming conventions indicate that DC metadata semantics may be too broad to describe the characteristics of domain and resource specific repositories, unlike cross-domain and heterogeneous resource types. The employment of a high number of refinement qualifiers may engender a higher degree of semantic specificity for describing heterogeneous resource types. The study provides insights into metadata semantics in relation to resource type, subject domain, and refinement qualifiers. The study also brings forth insights for metadata planning, quality control, and interoperability.
Online publication date: Tue, 16-Feb-2016
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies (IJMSO):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email email@example.com