Conceptions of sovereignty and identity economics: a Chinese-based exploration Online publication date: Fri, 21-Nov-2014
by Roda Mushkat
International Journal of Public Law and Policy (IJPLAP), Vol. 4, No. 3, 2014
Abstract: Constructivism has proved to be a powerful tool for dissecting international legal and political phenomena, such as sovereignty. However, like the intellectual paradigms which it seeks to complement, perhaps even unrealistically to supplant, this framework possesses limited explanatory power when proponents shun ideas from other sources and refrain from engaging in theoretical bridge-building. Identity economics has the potential to bring about cross-fertilisation between divergent schools of thought and, as China's experience selectively illustrates, place the empirical study of sovereignty on a firmer analytical footing.
Online publication date: Fri, 21-Nov-2014
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Public Law and Policy (IJPLAP):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email firstname.lastname@example.org