Unconscionability in letters of credit and demand guarantee transactions
by Alan Davidson
International Journal of Technology Policy and Law (IJTPL), Vol. 1, No. 2, 2012

Abstract: The backbone of the letter of credit is the autonomy principle, which dictates that banks deal with documents and are not concerned with nor bound by any underlying contract. This paper raises the controversial issue that the emerging unconscionability exception to this principle jeopardises the integrity and viability of the letter of credit product. Subsequent cases in Singapore and Malaysian replicate the underlying Australian principle without the legislative platform. The conclusion of the paper is that an understanding of the nature and purpose of letters of credit and the limited application of the fraud exception must lead lawyers in the field to conclude there should be no unconscionability exception.

Online publication date: Tue, 30-Sep-2014

The full text of this article is only available to individual subscribers or to users at subscribing institutions.

Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.

Pay per view:
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.

Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Technology Policy and Law (IJTPL):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:

    Username:        Password:         

Forgotten your password?

Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.

If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com