Do direct or indirect relations between incumbent firms and corporate spin-offs affect the performance of spin-offs? Online publication date: Wed, 04-Nov-2009
by Majbritt Rostgaard Evald, Ann Hojbjerg Clarke, Kent Wickstrom Jensen
International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing (IJEV), Vol. 1, No. 2, 2009
Abstract: This article focuses on the performance of corporate spin-offs. The existing literature agrees that corporate spin-offs perform better than independent start-ups. However, systematic evidence on the subject still seems elusive. We therefore review articles that specifically address the performance of corporate spin-offs. Furthermore, we argue there is a need to distinguish between different types of spin-offs when evaluating their performances relative to independent start-ups. In particular, not all spin-offs have the fortune of access to parts of the resource base of their incumbent firm. We therefore suggest a distinction between whether the spin-off has direct or only indirect relations with their incumbent firm. A Danish sample of 325 companies (spinoffs and independent start-ups) shows that spin-offs in general perform better than independent start-ups. In the group of spin-offs, performance differences also exist. Spin-offs with indirect relations to an incumbent firm perform better than spin-offs with direct relations.
Online publication date: Wed, 04-Nov-2009
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing (IJEV):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email email@example.com