2026 Vol.15 No.42025 Vol.15 No.32024 Vol.15 No.22024 Vol.15 No.12023 Vol.14 No.42023 Vol.14 No.3 Free Access2022 Vol.14 No.22022 Vol.14 No.12021 Vol.13 No.42021 Vol.13 No.1/2/32020 Vol.12 No.42020 Vol.12 No.2/32020 Vol.12 No.12019 Vol.11 No.42019 Vol.11 No.2/32019 Vol.11 No.12017 Vol.10 No.3/42016 Vol.10 No.22016 Vol.10 No.12015 Vol.9 No.2/3/42015 Vol.9 No.12014 Vol.8 No.3/42014 Vol.8 No.22013 Vol.8 No.12012 Vol.7 No.2/3/42012 Vol.7 No.12011 Vol.6 No.42011 Vol.6 No.32010 Vol.6 No.1/22009 Vol.5 No.42009 Vol.5 No.32009 Vol.5 No.22009 Vol.5 No.12008 Vol.4 No.42008 Vol.4 No.32008 Vol.4 No.22008 Vol.4 No.12007 Vol.3 No.42007 Vol.3 No.32007 Vol.3 No.22007 Vol.3 No.12006 Vol.2 No.42006 Vol.2 No.32006 Vol.2 No.22006 Vol.2 No.12005 Vol.1 No.42005 Vol.1 No.32005 Vol.1 No.22004 Vol.1 No.1

International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage (IJSSCA)

International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage

2005 Vol.1 No.3


Pages Title and author(s)
245-262Using axiomatic design to improve conceptual design robustness in Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) methodology
Matthew Hu, John Pieprzak
DOI: 10.1504/IJSSCA.2005.008091
263-275Grounding of Six Sigma's Breakthrough Cookbook: how to research a methodology?
Henk De Koning, Jeroen De Mast
DOI: 10.1504/IJSSCA.2005.008092
276-294Integration of customer and designer preferences in robust design
Srikrishna Madhumohan Govindaluri, Byung Rae Cho
DOI: 10.1504/IJSSCA.2005.008090
295-306Exploring Design for Six Sigma from the viewpoint of Robust Design Methodology
Ida Gremyr
DOI: 10.1504/IJSSCA.2005.008093
307-322Antecedents to successful implementation of Six Sigma
Agnes Y.T. Szeto, Albert H.C. Tsang
DOI: 10.1504/IJSSCA.2005.008094
323-354Six Sigma and its link to TQM, BPR, lean and the learning organisation
Itziar Ricondo, Elisabeth Viles
DOI: 10.1504/IJSSCA.2005.008095

 

Return to top