Great expectations: a regulatory promise unfulfilled Online publication date: Fri, 13-Apr-2018
by Mary Claire Mahaney; Murray Bryant
International Journal of Critical Accounting (IJCA), Vol. 10, No. 1, 2018
Abstract: The primary goal of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is to protect investors by deterring wrongdoing resulting in investor loss. The SEC deters wrongdoing in two ways: by threatening penalties and signalling illegal behaviour. If the SEC does not hold individuals accountable or if it is unclear what actions are illegal, wrongdoing will continue. Consent decrees have become the SEC's enforcement norm. Through negotiation both the defendant and the agency avoid costs and save time, but individuals responsible for wrongdoing have largely avoided personal accountability. Although firms have introduced clawback provisions into executive contracts, evidence shows that boards of directors largely have not activated clawbacks. Boards must hold employees personally responsible; thus boards should design executive contracts that clearly state the rationale for clawbacks and a means by which their amounts - amounts both fair and in the best interests of the corporation - can be established.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Critical Accounting (IJCA):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook