Capital structure mean reversion: a comparison between Chinese state-owned and private firms Online publication date: Thu, 12-Oct-2017
by Tanveer Ahsan; Abdur Rub
Global Business and Economics Review (GBER), Vol. 19, No. 6, 2017
Abstract: The study follows mean reversion approach and applies different panel unit root tests on a balanced data-set of 8,670 firm-year observations of Chinese non-financial firms, spread over ten years (2003-2012). The objective of the study is to investigate whether the leverage behaviour of Chinese non-financial firms is mean reverting and consequently, to decide between two competing theoretic frameworks (trade-off theory, pecking order theory). Overall panel test results for short term, long term and total leverage support trade-off financing behaviour. Further, the study categorises firms into state-owned and private firms and compares the leverage behaviour of two categories. The results of comparative analysis explain that leverage behaviour of both types of the firms (state-owned firms, private firms) is mean reverting and therefore supports trade-off theory of capital structure. Our study indicates that both types of the Chinese firms (state-owned firms, private firms) follow long-term financing strategy that is very important for the firms operating in an emerging economy.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the Global Business and Economics Review (GBER):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook