Knowledge management and administration depend on semiotic information systems Online publication date: Tue, 22-Nov-2005
by H. Will
International Journal of Management and Decision Making (IJMDM), Vol. 7, No. 1, 2006
Abstract: Knowledge management and administration have been defined according to the symbol system hypothesis. This paper argues that they depend instead on semiotic information systems that entail an event-driven and dispositional user perspective. Semiotics as the theory of signs implies that information systems be designed as contextual knowledge and action support systems. This has behavioural, conceptual and technological implications and suggests that cognitive, ethical, methodological, organisational and technological criteria must be met if we are to replace traditional, un-assuring data, model, and information processing systems with those that can provide assurances to their users. Assurance is a transient attribute of information because what we know changes frequently and what we receive in terms of information may neither be believable nor true. To dispel doubts requires built-in assurances based on proper internal control systems, understood as meta-information systems, and re-assurances by such assurors as competent, ethical, and independent auditors.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Management and Decision Making (IJMDM):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook