Numerical analysis of wind flow patterns over complex hilly terrains: comparison between two commonly used CFD software Online publication date: Wed, 04-May-2016
by A.Z. Dhunny; M.R. Lollchund; S.D.D.V. Rughooputh
International Journal of Global Energy Issues (IJGEI), Vol. 39, No. 3/4, 2016
Abstract: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has become a very useful tool to study the wind flow patterns over complex terrains. The present work evaluates the performance of some well-known CFD software for this endeavour. The CFD software considered are OpenFOAM and WindSim, each solving numerically the Reynolds Average Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations in the turbulent regime using the standard k-ε model. Different terrain complexity ranging from smooth terrain to more complex ones are considered: the Askervein and Bolund hills. Simulated results were verified and compared against actual measurements. The study concludes that, for more complex rough terrains, WindSim gives more accurate results as compared to OpenFOAM.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Global Energy Issues (IJGEI):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com