Constitutionality of the law on sex work in India
by Saloni Jain
International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies (IJHRCS), Vol. 3, No. 4, 2015

Abstract: The Immoral Trafficking Prevention Act is the main statute pertaining to sex work in India. It does not criminalise sex work as such (an individual worker is permitted to sell sex for merely her benefit in a place that is not near any public place in a discrete mode). However, it criminalises activities surrounding sex work, de facto criminalising sex work altogether. The Act punishes the sex worker (majority being women) but not the client (majority being men) unless the client is engaged in the activity in a public place. In this article, I contend that the ITPA violates the fundamental right to equality due to orthodox notions of patriarchal morality, that women are perceived to have certain gender specific roles, and that the judiciary reinforces these stereotypes reflecting an inherent bias towards sex work, indirectly discriminating against women.

Online publication date: Wed, 24-Feb-2016

The full text of this article is only available to individual subscribers or to users at subscribing institutions.

 
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.

Pay per view:
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.

Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies (IJHRCS):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:

    Username:        Password:         

Forgotten your password?


Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.

If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com