CONWIP: closed or semi-open queuing network?
by Sunderesh S. Heragu; Aman Gupta
International Journal of Operational Research (IJOR), Vol. 24, No. 3, 2015

Abstract: Closed queuing networks (CQNs) are generally used to model CONWIP systems. An implicit assumption in the CQN model is that whenever the work-in-process (WIP) level goes below the set value, there is always a job waiting for the released kanban. In other words, there are an infinite number of jobs in the external queue and as a result the kanban never waits in the resource pool. Modelling the CONWIP under this unrealistic assumption tends to underestimate the true cycle time of the kanban (and the job). In this technical note, we represent a CONWIP as a semi-open queuing network (SOQN) in which the job waits in the external queue until a kanban is available or vice-versa. Using published data and numerical experiments, we point out a modelling flaw of CONWIP systems in the literature and also show that the SOQN approach is a more appropriate model for representing CONWIP systems.

Online publication date: Tue, 06-Oct-2015

The full text of this article is only available to individual subscribers or to users at subscribing institutions.

 
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.

Pay per view:
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.

Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Operational Research (IJOR):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:

Username:        Password:          Forgotten your password?

Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.

If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com