Diagnostic efficacy value in terms of sensitivity and specificity of imaging modalities in detecting the abdominal aortic aneurysm: a systematic review Online publication date: Tue, 09-Dec-2014
by Abdullah O. Alamoudi; Syed Haque; Shankar Srinivasan; Dinesh P. Mital
International Journal of Medical Engineering and Informatics (IJMEI), Vol. 7, No. 1, 2015
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to examine whether duplex ultrasonography (DUS) or MR angiography (MRA) or CT angiography (CTA) is more applicable to use as alternative modality in terms of sensitivity and specificity for detection of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). A search of the medical databases was performed for describing AAA evaluation and detection. Twenty eight studies were found and met the selection criteria. Diameter of aneurysms was categorised by size: ≤ 2.5 cm of the aneurysm diameter. For aneurisms ≤ 2.5 cm, the mean reported sensitivities and specificities were DUS: 81% and 91.1%; CTA: 84.3% and 98.4%; MRA: 95.8% and 95.8%, respectively compared DSA as gold standard. MRA has the highest sensitivity and CTA has the highest specificity reported diagnostic accuracy in detecting the aneurysm ≤ 2.5 cm of AAA diameter and they could be used as a reliable alternative modality to invasive DSA.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Medical Engineering and Informatics (IJMEI):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook