Creating competitive advantage: a stakeholder view of employee ownership Online publication date: Sat, 25-Oct-2014
by Peter B. Thompson; Abagail McWilliams; Mark Shanley
International Journal of Strategic Change Management (IJSCM), Vol. 5, No. 3, 2014
Abstract: The discussion in this paper offers answers to two questions: Why do employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) tend to perform, on average, better than non-ESOP firms, and why do some ESOPs survive and thrive while others underperform or are terminated? Using Donaldson and Lorsch's (1983) framework we argue that an ESOP can provide incentives that enable managers to mitigate internal conflict, competition for resources, and transaction costs by reducing its dependence upon the product, capital, and labour markets allowing the firm to be more responsive to the external environment and resulting in superior performance. Reduced resource dependence, and increased cooperation among internal stakeholders are not a given; it is the fact of mutual ownership that makes it so. Some ESOP companies are not successful in achieving the necessary stakeholder-resource balance. For that reason they - and firms that are not employee owned - underperform compared to the average ESOP company.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Strategic Change Management (IJSCM):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com