Why have post-Keynesians had (relatively) little to say on the economics of the environment?
by Andrew Mearman
International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment (IJEWE), Vol. 1, No. 2, 2005

Abstract: This paper examines the reasons for the relative lack of post-Keynesian work on the economics of the environment. The paper draws on new questionnaire and interview data collected by the author from leading contemporary post-Keynesians. The data suggest that there are many reasons why post-Keynesians have had little to say on the environment. The main reasons are: post-Keynesians have adopted a strategic focus on criticising orthodox monetary and pricing theory; they have used static tools ill-equipped for analysing the environment; and they have focused more on growth and full employment.

Online publication date: Wed, 02-Mar-2005

The full text of this article is only available to individual subscribers or to users at subscribing institutions.

 
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.

Pay per view:
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.

Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment (IJEWE):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:

Username:        Password:          Forgotten your password?

Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.

If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com