Twofold malevolence of bank and audit failures
by Jonathan Njoku
African J. of Accounting, Auditing and Finance (AJAAF), Vol. 2, No. 4, 2013

Abstract: This paper aims to better understand why banks have collapsed even though prior audit opinions gave them clean bill of health, especially in the context of financial crisis. The popular notion attributes audit failure mainly to moral hazard. Nevertheless, when cast within the public secrecy lens, the realities of ethical dilemma and knowledge gap emerge. Ethical dilemma manifests problems of compromise of independence, moral hazard, collusion and the muteness of the law of silence. In addition, knowledge gap constrains prediction of the probability of bank failure through the myth of knowledge that cannot be shared, the hardship in articulating labour of the negative and the fear of defacement shock. The twofold ills necessitate fusion of ethical perspectives in coping with ethical dilemma. Furthermore, fusion of normal audit risk model and surveillance anatomic model would be relevant in narrowing knowledge gap for effective prediction of bank going concern status.

Online publication date: Tue, 29-Jul-2014

The full text of this article is only available to individual subscribers or to users at subscribing institutions.

 
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.

Pay per view:
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.

Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the African J. of Accounting, Auditing and Finance (AJAAF):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:

Username:        Password:          Forgotten your password?

Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.

If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com