Hobbes, Seabright, and our ancestors: institutionalist theory and the writing of evolutionary history
by John F. Henry
International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education (IJPEE), Vol. 5, No. 1, 2014

Abstract: Recently, a debate has ensued as to whether neoclassical economics has jettisoned its inward looking, reductionism of the past in favour of a more open evolutionary style, making it more compatible with institutional economics. Paul Seabright's, The Company of Strangers: A Natural History of Economic Life claims to do precisely this and thus it is worthwhile to critically assess its efforts. Does it really represent a fundamental change or it is merely window dressing, serving up the same neoclassical analysis in slightly different form? This paper evaluates Seabright's claim from largely an (old) institutionalist perspective and finds that fundamentally The Company of Strangers fits quite comfortably within the confines of traditional neoclassicism; thus, no 'bridge' has been established which would allow a more fruitful interchange with 'old' institutionalism.

Online publication date: Sat, 05-Jul-2014

The full text of this article is only available to individual subscribers or to users at subscribing institutions.

 
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.

Pay per view:
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.

Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education (IJPEE):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:

Username:        Password:          Forgotten your password?

Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.

If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com