To what extent are American and Japanese managerial concepts and techniques converging? Online publication date: Mon, 07-Feb-2005
by Leslie E. Grayson, Orson Watson
Global Business and Economics Review (GBER), Vol. 1, No. 2, 1999
Abstract: This paper explains the effects of the Japanese recession and the accelerated pace of globalisation and technological diffusion on the rationalisation of what were previously held up as the mainstays of Japanese management. These are the key questions: What caused the failure of the superior Japanese industrial agenda that was guided by the much-lauded Japanese management models of the 1980s? What are the managerial values, concepts, and norms that enabled the U.S. economy to move expeditiously toward reforms and inhibited the Japanese from doing the same? Finally, which managerial values, concepts and norms are culturally determined, which are financially determined, or both, or are they a mix, and if so, how has this mix changed over time? The paper concludes with a reexamination of notions of Japanese and/or American cultural dominance as they express themselves in theories of management, drawing conclusions about the erosion of nationally distinct management practices in the face of a globalisation.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the Global Business and Economics Review (GBER):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook