Two theories of the subprime crisis: governance failure or mere greed? Online publication date: Tue, 03-Mar-2015
by Cameron Gordon
International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance (IJBAF), Vol. 4, No. 1, 2013
Abstract: This paper examines two theories of the 'subprime crisis' or 'GFC'. The 'financial architecture' theory holds that the failure of the financial system was fundamentally driven by institutional faults, especially in private sector risk management and public sector regulation and underpins the system reform approaches currently being taken by much of the developed world. The other theory, referred to as the 'inevitability school' here, emphasises the irrational aspects of human behaviour and complex systems which lead to inevitable cycles and collapses. This paper provides a framework for assessing the relative merit of these two theories in explaining the current crisis and then applies that framework to existing evidence focusing on the role that institutional governance failure may have played. The general conclusion is that both schools explain parts of the crisis, but that institutional reforms are likely to have relatively little preventive effect beyond the short to medium term.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance (IJBAF):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook