Comparison of SEMG signals of healthy and amputee subject for elbow movement
by Hardeep S. Ryait; A.S. Arora; Ravinder Agarwal
International Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology (IJBET), Vol. 12, No. 2, 2013

Abstract: Surface Electromyography Signals (SEMG) technologies have prominent acceptability for controlling prosthetic devices among amputee. However, most of them are based on SEMG analysis of healthy subjects. There is the need to study SEMG of the residual muscles of the amputees who had lost their limbs more than ten years ago in comparison to the healthy subjects. In the present investigation, elbow movements from single location near elbow of a healthy subject were studied and the results were compared with an amputee (distal to the elbow). This research is useful for correlating phantom movement and SEMG activities in the stump muscles even when the limb-loss period is significant. It was observed that extension movement in the amputee achieved higher values of Vrms than flexion movement. Pronation and supination showed no significant changes in SEMG. These observations were almost similar with those observed from a healthy subject.

Online publication date: Sat, 27-Sep-2014

The full text of this article is only available to individual subscribers or to users at subscribing institutions.

 
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.

Pay per view:
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.

Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology (IJBET):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:

    Username:        Password:         

Forgotten your password?


Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.

If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com