Fertiliser taxation and regulation of nonpoint water pollution: a critical analysis based on European experiences Online publication date: Tue, 12-Oct-2004
by Francois Bel, Gerard Drouet D'Aubigny, Anne Lacroix, Amedee Mollard
International Journal of Water (IJW), Vol. 2, No. 4, 2004
Abstract: In Europe, the effectiveness of current forms of control of nonpoint nitrogen pollution is considered to be weak. This assessment highlights the need to introduce more efficient modes of regulation. Many economists recommend a simple tax based on known polluting factors, for example a tax on purchases of mineral fertilisers. In addition to its simplicity of application and low information cost, one can argue that this tax has already been implemented in several European countries and could prefigure a more general decision at European Union level. However, the same economists disagree as to the valuation of the decreasing use of fertilisers that could be expected, since the issue of the price-elasticity of demand is highly controversial. The aim of this paper is to present a critical assessment of research undertaken up to now and of actual experiences in taxation. We also highlight the role of determining factors in long-term trends in the consumption of nitrogen fertilisers in European countries.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Water (IJW):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook