A critical disability theory analysis of wrongful life/birth actions in Israel
by Nili Karako-Eyal
International Journal of Private Law (IJPL), Vol. 6, No. 3, 2013

Abstract: Wrongful life/birth actions raise difficult questions. The Israeli Supreme Court of Justice's recent ruling in the case of Hamer (2012) reflects these difficulties. The court decided that wrongful life actions should not be admitted. By contrast, wrongful birth actions were approved. This paper offers a critical disability theory analysis of the decision in Hamer. The author claims that the court's refusal to acknowledge wrongful life actions constitutes an important positive legal narrative. Nevertheless, the judicial narrative provided in other parts of the decision makes only a marginal contribution to the positive social structuring of disability. Therefore, the author suggests a new approach that is based on the parents' right to autonomy. The author claims that this position does not involve negative connotation towards people with disabilities and enable the court to compensate the parents for the damages they suffered.

Online publication date: Fri, 29-Nov-2013

The full text of this article is only available to individual subscribers or to users at subscribing institutions.

 
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.

Pay per view:
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.

Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Private Law (IJPL):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:

Username:        Password:          Forgotten your password?

Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.

If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com