Examining tournament theory in academe: implications for the field of human resource development Online publication date: Sat, 05-Jul-2014
by Ross E. Azevedo; Mesut Akdere; Eric C. Larson
Middle East J. of Management (MEJM), Vol. 1, No. 1, 2013
Abstract: In a unique approach to applying theory to practice based on concepts of participant observation, this paper discusses and analyses potential applications of tournament theory to the academe with specific implications to the field of human resource development (HRD). For purposes of this paper, tournament theory, originally intended to explain large compensation packages given to CEOs and other executives, provides analysis and predictions for academe and specifically to the field of HRD, where predictions are not very optimistic for those entering the field as academics. The paper argues that tournaments in academe are becoming more complex and more difficult to compete and win, thus making it much more difficult to advance in the academe.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the Middle East J. of Management (MEJM):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com