Consideration of human factors in investigations of structural failures Online publication date: Sat, 13-Sep-2014
by David T. Young
International Journal of Forensic Engineering (IJFE), Vol. 1, No. 3/4, 2013
Abstract: Investigations of claimed structural failures often lead to conclusions based on structural factors including strength and serviceability. Typically, these conclusions are absolute, since they result from objective comparisons of results to limits prescribed by owners and/or governing agencies. Occasionally, however, the failure of a structure may be defined by human factors, which are more subjective. A case is presented herein that describes the evolution of an investigation from one of only structural factors to one that included human factors. Discussion focuses on 'failure' being defined by the inability of the structure to restrict human annoyance. In this case, excessive building vibrations were claimed to render the occupants unable to perform their work as intended. Investigation, presentation and solution processes are described in order to contrast differences between absolute failure decisions based on structural factors and relative failure decisions based on human factors.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Forensic Engineering (IJFE):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook