To hedge or not to hedge during the financial crisis: a case study
by Simona Mihai-Yiannaki
Global Business and Economics Review (GBER), Vol. 15, No. 2/3, 2013

Abstract: Based mainly on secondary research analysis this case study tracks down foreign exchange risk as exposure during the recent financial crisis (March 2007 to February 2010). The author picked up a value of €100,000 traded by a Cypriot SME importer with a local bank on a monthly basis under either a forward contract or a spot transaction against other three hard currencies. Methodologically, the research uses Sharpe ratio as proxy for either hedge or non-hedge options, ignoring any intermediary hedging alternatives and transaction costs. Then, the hedging strategy proves it backs up the 'unbiased predictor' preconception and then validates it against a weak and a semi-strong efficient market hypothesis theory. Also, I found a dependency on non-hedging more to the currency depreciation, the reduction of the risk free rates, the volatility of the FWD and actual future spot prices in the market, as well as longer time periods.

Online publication date: Wed, 30-Oct-2013

The full text of this article is only available to individual subscribers or to users at subscribing institutions.

 
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.

Pay per view:
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.

Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the Global Business and Economics Review (GBER):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:

Username:        Password:          Forgotten your password?

Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.

If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com