Objective pluralism: the comparative law tool
by Edward Thomas Canuel
International Journal of Private Law (IJPL), Vol. 6, No. 2, 2013

Abstract: This article examines the import of objective pluralism, applying this methodology to a complex contractual clause embedded within transborder agreements - namely, damages clauses. The review focuses on how damages clauses are interpreted in the US and Norwegian contexts, representing legal systems from the common and civil law legal traditions, respectively.

Online publication date: Fri, 29-Nov-2013

The full text of this article is only available to individual subscribers or to users at subscribing institutions.

 
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.

Pay per view:
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.

Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Private Law (IJPL):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:

Username:        Password:          Forgotten your password?

Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.

If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com