Parents behaving badly: whether, in the wake of Miller-Jenkins, public policy considerations should play a role in custody decisions
by Ethan Kate
International Journal of Public Law and Policy (IJPLAP), Vol. 3, No. 2, 2013

Abstract: Miller-Jenkins v. Miller-Jenkins illustrates the dilemma facing courts in contentious custody disputes: when should the best interests of one child cede to society's interests? Undoubtedly aware of this dilemma, the Miller-Jenkins court cloaked its public policy concerns under the guise of the child's long-term interests. By analysing Miller-Jenkins as it relates to the USA and foreign cases, this article contextualises the situation, showing how courts can attempt to resolve this dilemma. Specifically, a Canadian case demonstrates how a court can assess the child's psychological needs before reaching a decision supported by public policy considerations. Such considerations can improve courts' decision-making capabilities.

Online publication date: Fri, 29-Nov-2013

The full text of this article is only available to individual subscribers or to users at subscribing institutions.

 
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.

Pay per view:
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.

Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Public Law and Policy (IJPLAP):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:

Username:        Password:          Forgotten your password?

Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.

If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com