Auditing standards and the expectations gap: evidence from Spain Online publication date: Thu, 07-Aug-2014
by Emiliano Ruiz-Barbadillo; Nieves Gómez-Aguilar; Estibaliz Biedma-López; Nieves Carrera
International Journal of Critical Accounting (IJCA), Vol. 4, No. 5/6, 2012
Abstract: This article examines the impact of auditing standards intending to reduce the audit expectations gap on auditors' behaviour. Specifically, we examine whether the adoption of an auditing standard ongoing concern evaluation in Spain is associated with changes in auditors' behaviour. Our empirical results suggest that the implementation of the new standard did not impact on auditors' propensity to issue going concern opinions; on auditors' interest on maintaining their reputation; and on the influence of auditors' economic incentives. Our results indicate that the implementation of auditing standards seems not to have an impact on day-to-day auditing practices, and therefore, auditing standards related to going concern evaluation fail to reduce the expectations gap. Our results also suggest that, in spite of the differences between the regulatory framework of auditing in Spain and in Anglo-Saxon countries (e.g., degree of state intervention), the impact of such standards on auditors' behaviour are comparable.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Critical Accounting (IJCA):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook