Project-oriented management: dealing with contradictions Online publication date: Sat, 30-Aug-2014
by David Thyssen; Michael Gessler
International Journal of Applied Systemic Studies (IJASS), Vol. 4, No. 3, 2012
Abstract: More and more modern companies are choosing to organise their work in temporary and permanent forms at the same time. In doing so, they have to face contradictions between different modes of organising. Project management is well established to manage the temporary forms of work, while line management is used to manage permanent forms. This article introduces the concept of project-oriented management as a promising, though ambitious approach for dealing with the inevitable contradictions and dilemmas' that arise in those organisations using both ways of organising at the same time. We present the findings of an empirical case study that revealed 178 obvious and hidden contradictions between temporary and permanent work inside a project-oriented company. The case study uses the repertory grid technique to uncover the personal constructs - individual images of reality - of line and project managers. Our quantitative and qualitative analysis shows that more than 70% of the contradictions may be explained by two distinctions.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Applied Systemic Studies (IJASS):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook