Economics and 'excess': implications for understanding and combating climate change Online publication date: Mon, 31-Mar-2014
by Tidings P. Ndhlovu; John Cameron
International Journal of Sustainable Economy (IJSE), Vol. 5, No. 1, 2013
Abstract: This paper contends that concerns with excess, alongside scarcity, have been present in the work of key analysts in economic thought, from Adam Smith to today's models of 'resource curses'. In the context of climate change, Bataille's vision of the 'accursed share' raises an important issue on how to use 'excess' of human energy without further damaging the physical environment on which human activity depends and the extent to which US decision-making after the Second World War is likely to impact on the attainment of a possible sustainable global order. For him, institutional decisions underpinning global redistribution, known as the Marshall Plan, were a much more rational response to the challenges of that time than the more timid decisions that produced the Bretton Woods institutions. From the 1970s, growing concerns about the impact of human (production) activity on the earth's physical environment, notably climate change, raised these issues anew.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Sustainable Economy (IJSE):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook