Equity, quantum physics, dreamtime and nature's title
by Peter Boulot
International Journal of Liability and Scientific Enquiry (IJLSE), Vol. 5, No. 2, 2012

Abstract: The origins of the equitable jurisdiction were premised on correcting defects in the common law to prevent unconscionable conduct. Although property law presupposes separation of person from place, a court of equity may be persuaded by scientific evidence, which supports an interconnected and interdependent world, where person cannot be separated from nature, nor from place. Australian aboriginal dreamtime practices underscored the High Court's decision to overturn the terra nullius doctrine, giving rise to native title recognition. These same practices could with additional scientific empirical evidence give support for a court of equity to acknowledge rights for nature.

Online publication date: Thu, 31-Jul-2014

The full text of this article is only available to individual subscribers or to users at subscribing institutions.

 
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.

Pay per view:
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.

Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Liability and Scientific Enquiry (IJLSE):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:

Username:        Password:          Forgotten your password?

Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.

If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com