Why the theory of comparative advantage is wrong
by Ian Fletcher
International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education (IJPEE), Vol. 2, No. 4, 2011

Abstract: The theory of comparative advantage is widely misunderstood to demonstrate the universal superiority of free trade. In fact, the theory depends upon a number of key assumptions and fails if they are relaxed. Empirically, many of these assumptions are highly questionable, if not demonstrably false. Among them are an absence of externalities, a lack of international capital mobility, and no income-inequality effects. Also included are assumptions about optimal short- and long-term growth strategies being identical and domestic factor mobility being costless.

Online publication date: Thu, 29-Jan-2015

The full text of this article is only available to individual subscribers or to users at subscribing institutions.

 
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.

Pay per view:
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.

Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education (IJPEE):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:

Username:        Password:          Forgotten your password?

Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.

If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com