Identity theft and internet Online publication date: Thu, 31-Jul-2014
by Philippe Jougleux
International Journal of Liability and Scientific Enquiry (IJLSE), Vol. 5, No. 1, 2012
Abstract: The captivating issue of false identity on internet is already an old phenomenon, but until now no uniform legal response really exists. For some, anonymity is deemed to be a right, but for others, using a false identity will be a tort. Thus, the protection of the identity takes various forms, both in civil action and in criminal procedure. However, the question involves a second aspect, not only in substantial law, but also in the field of law of evidence: how does one prove the real identity of the author of a computer related crime? The difficulty to connect the use of an IP address, or even of an electronic certificate, to a real person leads automatically to other legal responses which aim more directly to condemn identity theft and unauthorised access to information systems! The objective of this paper is to discuss the need of a reformulation of the concept of identity theft in order to correspond to the evolution of the behaviour and frauds. On the internet, identity theft is not the same as in the real world – a means of the commission of other offences, but is rather an autonomous crime.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Liability and Scientific Enquiry (IJLSE):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook