GREEned National STAtistical and Modelling Procedures: the GREENSTAMP approach to the calculation of environmentally adjusted national income figures
by Roy Brouwer, Martin O'Connor, Walter Radermacher
International Journal of Sustainable Development (IJSD), Vol. 2, No. 1, 1999

Abstract: The paper gives an overview of the GREENSTAMP Project (GREEned National STAtistical and Modelling Procedures) which, during 1994–1996, developed results and recommendations concerning empirically and theoretically robust methods for greening national accounts. The recommended approach centres on methods for quantifying economic opportunity costs associated with meeting specified environmental performance standards. In this perspective, a ''greened GDP'' is a hypothetical measure of a performance potential, viz., an estimate of the level of output (or of consumption, or of national income, etc.) that a national economy would be able to achieve while simultaneously respecting specified environmental quality and resource husbandry requirements. The GREENSTAMP approach is modular, establishing linkages with different categories of data and analyses. First, information is organised in so-called satellite environmental accounts, which describe the state of the environment according to chosen categories and measures (largely non-monetary), and which establish links between economic activity sectors and environmental change in terms of the pressures acting on each environmental category. Second, cost information is obtained through various levels of analysis (firms and households, sectors and macro-economic aggregates) about the economic resource requirements – such as investments needed or consumption foregone – that would be necessary in order to reduce a specified environmental pressure. Environmental defensive expenditures, pollution avoidance cost curves, and macroeconomic comparative static and dynamic scenario modelling are among the applicable cost concepts and tools. In this cost-effectiveness perspective, the value of environmental assets and services is not estimated in monetary terms directly. Rather, estimates of the costs – at various scales of analysis and timeframes – of specified improvements in environmental performance are considered in relation to scientific, political and economic judgements about the importance of the environmental functions, services and assets in question.

Online publication date: Mon, 10-May-2004

The full text of this article is only available to individual subscribers or to users at subscribing institutions.

 
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.

Pay per view:
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.

Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Sustainable Development (IJSD):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:

    Username:        Password:         

Forgotten your password?


Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.

If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com