An interpretative evaluation of a healthcare intranet Online publication date: Mon, 10-May-2004
by Ela Klecun, Tony Cornford
International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management (IJHTM), Vol. 5, No. 6, 2003
Abstract: The evaluation of information systems and health information systems in particular, is recognised as a complex and challenging activity. There is no agreement on a ''best way'' to evaluate, on what and how to evaluate, who to involve and within what paradigm to proceed. This paper argues that evaluation is a situated activity that requires a more interpretative approach, broadly based on hermeneutic principles. The paper reviews a number of guidelines and frameworks for evaluation presented in the medical and information systems literature, focusing on two related approaches: the context, process and content framework, and structure, process and outcome framework. A synthesis of these were used in the case study described – the evaluation of an intranet pilot deployment within primary care. The literature review and research experience (including the case study) form the basis for a set of general recommendations presented in the conclusion section.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management (IJHTM):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook