Contra contractarianism
by Gabriel D. Donleavy
International Journal of Economics and Accounting (IJEA), Vol. 1, No. 3, 2010

Abstract: Classical ethics are universal in their claims to bind people, but the field of business ethics has been especially vulnerable to ethical relativism. Within the field of jurisprudence there has been an attempt to decouple law from ethics by arguing law has an inner morality divorceable from its substantive provisions. Van Oosterhout et al. (2006) import this approach into the field of business relations in general and business contracts in particular. They claim integrated social contract theory is the best ethical paradigm for business, because it admits as ethics only what contracting parties have agreed to and a tiny number of additional norms that are generally accepted in the applicable business community. This attempt to privatise ethics is critically deconstructed in the present paper, by way of challenging a potentially virulent strain of ethical relativism.

Online publication date: Tue, 09-Nov-2010

The full text of this article is only available to individual subscribers or to users at subscribing institutions.

 
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.

Pay per view:
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.

Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Economics and Accounting (IJEA):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:

Username:        Password:          Forgotten your password?

Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.

If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com