A comparative study of financial performance of freestanding ambulatory surgery centres and hospital-based outpatient departments: 1997-2004 Online publication date: Sun, 05-Sep-2010
by Askar Chukmaitov, Anqi Tang, Robert G. Brooks
International Journal of Public Policy (IJPP), Vol. 6, No. 3/4, 2010
Abstract: We compared financial performance of freestanding ambulatory surgery centres (ASCs) and hospital-based outpatient departments (HOPDs). Patient-level ambulatory surgery data (1997-2004) for the state of Florida were assembled and analysed. We used a pooled, cross-sectional design. We applied multiple regression models to study pricing differences for freestanding ASCs and HOPDs. Substantial charge differences exist for patients undergoing the most common outpatient procedures, and that these differentials are in favour of freestanding ASCs over HOPDs in the majority of studied procedures. These differences in charges are large enough to presume that they may translate into similar difference in actual costs. Although previous research does not show a clear 'winner' (neither ASCs nor HOPDs) in terms of quality outcomes, healthcare policymakers, payers, and patients may be led to look more carefully at charge and cost data in their contracting processes, or choosing a certain provider of outpatient services.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Public Policy (IJPP):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook