FASB's initiatives to improve on the quality of standards: the role of constituents at the commentary stage Online publication date: Sat, 03-Jul-2010
by Andrew Ayimbila Anabila
International Journal of Economics and Accounting (IJEA), Vol. 1, No. 1/2, 2010
Abstract: To improve on the quality of standards, FASB has taken certain initiatives. They include a plan to adopt a principles-based approach to standard setting, issue standards jointly with the IASB, and shorten the commentary period. These require participation from constituents. This study examines comment letters on five proposals, for an insight to the role of constituents in the due process and these initiatives. It points out significant limitations in prior research that claimed low participation among constituents. The manner in which FASB handles comment letters sometimes disaffects constituents. This can stall the quality initiative, and widen the expectations gap. From the comment letters, a majority of constituents accept a principles-based approach but apparently contradict themselves by requiring detailed guidance. The evidence shows that shorter commentary periods could hurt quality. Further, non-USA constituents addressed more questions and disagreed more with FASB's provisions. Implications for FASB's initiatives are explored.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Economics and Accounting (IJEA):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook