Is FDI always good? An evaluation of the impact of flows into Nigeria Online publication date: Thu, 25-Feb-2010
by Chukwuma Agu, Anthonia Ifeyinwa Achike
International Journal of Liability and Scientific Enquiry (IJLSE), Vol. 3, No. 1/2, 2010
Abstract: It is generally assumed in the literature that Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is always good for an economy. Consequently, policy makers in developing countries, particularly in Africa, use their limited resources to pursue FDI at all costs. In this work, we question whether this conventional wisdom always stands. Using data on FDI and capital flows into Nigeria over time, we try to show that FDI has been concentrated in service and extractive sectors with weak linkages to the rest of the economy. Consequently, Nigeria has hardly reaped any meaningful gains despite being host to a huge proportion of FDI to developing countries. Instead, employment and development of the real sector are regularly undermined by the nature and timing of the flows. To make FDI more meaningful, we recommend more targeting in terms of sectoral direction of FDI as well as strengthening of the regulatory framework that forces FDI to be more responsive to the growth needs of the host.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Liability and Scientific Enquiry (IJLSE):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook