Who needs contingency approaches and guidelines in order to adapt vague management ideas? Online publication date: Fri, 11-Dec-2009
by Anders Ortenblad
International Journal of Learning and Change (IJLC), Vol. 4, No. 1, 2010
Abstract: The purpose of this conceptual paper is to question the assumption that the general idea of the learning organisation needs to be adapted to the specific context before it can be put into practical use. It is suggested that there are lots of ways to use management ideas, other than implementing them in the practice of organisations. It is further suggested that managers have different reasons for taking an interest in management ideas. Five ideal types of users are suggested: absorbers, innovators, legitimators, seducers and patchers. It is argued that the absorber is the only ideal type that would really be helped by adaptation guidelines. Therefore, the need for such guidelines could be questioned. However, adaptation guidelines could also be of use to other people than managers – it is suggested that other stakeholders, especially employees, could gain from contingency models and adaptation guidelines, since these clarify the ideas as well as threats and opportunities which they are associated with.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Learning and Change (IJLC):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook