An institutional perspective on quality initiatives: evidence beyond manufacturing Online publication date: Thu, 03-Dec-2009
by Jami L. DelliFraine, James R. Langabeer
International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management (IJISCM), Vol. 4, No. 1, 2009
Abstract: Organisational quality improvement techniques have been gaining acceptance in industry over the last few decades, although the extent of their utilisation is highly variable. Most of the evidence of their potential has been within the manufacturing sector, and it is unclear whether they have scope or value outside of manufacturing. We examine two quality improvement initiatives, Lean and Six Sigma, to assess adoption from an institutional theory perspective in the healthcare industry. Findings from our survey of 118 organisations suggest that these quality initiatives have higher levels of rhetoric than actual results. From an institutional theory perspective, results suggest that early adopters of these quality techniques will have a different focus or emphasis than late adopters, and that the focus changes overtime from clinical projects to administrative projects. Implications suggest a need for greater emphasis on change management to mitigate the perceived internal sources of resistance.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management (IJISCM):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook