Different parameterisation of a Gaussian scheme: intercomparison study Online publication date: Wed, 16-Jul-2003
by George Mocioaca, Sabina Stefan
International Journal of Environment and Pollution (IJEP), Vol. 19, No. 1, 2003
Abstract: The aim of this work is to define the most efficient parameterisation of the PBL (planetary boundary layer) by using the simulation with a simple Gaussian dispersion model of the plume type and comparing it with the improved OML model. A different type of σy and σz parameterisation in a Gaussian dispersion scheme was introduced. The old Pasquill–Gifford scheme and the new boundary layer parameterisation based on Monin–Obukhov length and other convective scaling parameters were compared, using a classical Gaussian model. For this comparison, the hourly average concentration and the long-term concentrations generated by these models, using same input data, were computed. These computed values and the field observations clearly show the importance of the parameterisations used by the models and the necessity of improving them. With this new parameterisation, we can easily add in new phenomena, such as dry and wet deposition, building effects and stack tip downwash penetration.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Environment and Pollution (IJEP):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook